Os Progressistas não perdoam

Um artigo de Alexander Dugin:

«THE UNITED STATES COURT AGAINST THE IDEOLOGY OF PROGRESS»

Um excerto, para abrir o apetite:

«The fact is that there is not just one American state, but two countries and two nations with this name and this is becoming more and more evident. It is not even a question of Republicans and Democrats, whose conflict is becoming increasingly bitter. It is the fact that there is a deeper division in American society.

Half of the US population is an advocate of pragmatism. This means that for them there is only one yardstick: it works or it doesn't work, it works/it doesn't work. That is all. And no dogma either about the subject or the object. Everyone can see himself as whatever he wants, including Elvis Presley or Father Christmas, and if it works, no one dares to object. It is the same with the outside world: there are no inviolable laws, do what you want with the outside world, but if it responds harshly, that is your problem. There are no entities, only interactions. This is the basis of Native American identity, it is the way Americans themselves have traditionally understood liberalism: as freedom to think what you want, to believe what you want, and to behave as you want. Of course, if it comes to conflict, the freedom of one is limited by the freedom of the other, but without trying you cannot know where the fine line is. Try it, maybe it will work.

That is how American society has been up to a certain point. Here, banning abortion, allowing abortion, sex change, punishing sex change, gay parades or neo-Nazi parades were all possible, nothing was turned away at the door, the decision could be anything, and the courts, relying on a multitude of unpredictable criteria, precedents and considerations, were the last resort to decide, in problematic cases, what worked/doesn't work. This is the mysterious side of the Americans, completely misunderstood by Europeans, and also the key to their success: they have no boundaries, which means they go where they want until someone stops them, and that is exactly what works.

But in the American elite, which is made up of people from a wide variety of backgrounds, at some point a critically large number of non-Americans have accumulated. They are predominantly Europeans, often from Russia. Many are ethnically Jewish but imbued with European or Russian-Soviet principles and cultural codes. They brought a different culture and philosophy to the United States. They did not understand or accept American pragmatism at all, seeing it only as a backdrop for their own advancement. That is, they took advantage of American opportunities, but did not intend to adopt a libertarian logic unrelated to any hint of totalitarianism. In reality, it was these alien elites who hijacked the old American democracy. It was they who took the helm of globalist structures and gradually seized power in the United States.

These elites, often left-liberal, sometimes openly Trotskyist, have brought with them a position that is deeply alien to the American spirit: the belief in linear progress. Progress and pragmatism are incompatible. If progress works, fine. If not, it must be abandoned. Here is the law of pragmatism: it works/doesn't work. If you want to move forward, move forward, if you want the opposite, no problem, that's freedom the American way.

However, the emigrants from the Old World brought with them very different attitudes. For them, progress was a dogma. All history was seen as continuous improvement, as a continuous process of emancipation, improvement, development and accumulation of knowledge. Progress was a philosophy and a religion.»

Entretanto, os CIA/MI6 (disfarçados de ucranistões ) fizeram explodir a filha do pensador russo. Este será o cenário menos sinistro. Espero que os russos percebam bem com quem se estão a meter e comecem a agir mais em conformidade. Depois de tentativas abertas de causar um desastre nuclear, de guerra química e de acções encobertas na Crimeia, agora já passaram ao terrorismo puro e duro. A santidade é assim: impune.

Quem "tratou" da viatura? Apostaria na Mafia russa. Convém não esquecer as redes do narcotráfico que a CIA entreteceu a partir do Afeganistão, durante as duas ocupações, soviética e amerdicana. A CIA faz outsourcing para certos serviços. E há toda uma rede de contactos, interesses e "facilitações"... E formas de alavancaria e chantagem. ( E aqui, agora sim, não há outra forma: temos que "teorizar" sobre a conspiração. E "teorizar" significa apenas isso: junto com a contemplação do facto, a tentativa de explicá-lo e, concomitantemente, entendê-lo. Com todos os riscos que daí emanam. E toda a nebulosa que o envolve.)